More Pages: Cooke Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22


A good holiday read
Want an image of Australia?

Love Burke, but could have left this one on the shelf
No One Captures the Human Condition Like Burke

Great reference but dry readingThe presentation is organized chronologically with broad outlines for each continent. Brief explication is given for the more weighty events, and short summary paragraphs capture major movements such as the Middle Ages, Renaissance, and the Age of Discovery. Color photographs and maps skillfully flesh out the text.
Like many British writers, however, this trio has a tendency to confuse wars and succession of kings, usually English, with history. They focus, for example, on insignificant facts such as how Harold Godwinson came to power and whom he battled prior to his defeat by William the Conqueror. In contrast, the history of ideas (e.g., philosophy, science, technology, political theory, and law), with its indelible imprint on modern society, is spotty at best. British myopia is evident in the treatment of Napoleon, portraying him as a militaristic opportunist rather than a civilizing force who brought laws, codes, and a semblance of equality to a neo-feudal continent.
Late twentieth century history is principally reduced to news headlines. The abdication of the Duke of Windsor and the catastrophic loss of the Challeger get far more attention than the transformation of Eastern Europe and Asia or revolutionary developments in communications, information, transportation, and biology.
As a quick thumb-through reference, History's Timeline is unmatched. For a more novelesque read, albeit frequently apocryphal, try H.G. Wells' Outline of History.
An Excellent Quick Reference

Pretty. Pretty vacant.I'd seen photos of Stockholder's installations and was excited for more. When I found she had a volume in this series I was thrilled. As I'd hoped, there were more photos of even more fantastic installations - massive, colorful, and complicated constructions of as many different materials and textures as you can imagine. It all looked great.
But my enthusiasm quickly faded. Reading the artist interview I found her to be not just a devout disciple of the art-for-art's-sake formalist school, but downright giddy about the idea. That's not a BAD thing, though its really not MY thing, but to get a perspective on where this formalism is coming from, check out some of these quotes. "I've always felt uncomfortable in museums and galleries. There's a kind of deadening in those places that I work in response to." Huh. "Even so, I love what the art institution makes possible . . . it's a place where you can express anything, and explore any thing without hurting your neighbor" (13). On her creative process she says, "I begin in a very physical place, without a lot of words. . . . There's a quiet - there are no words for what I'm going to do" (14). So if this kind of serious thinking appeals to you, go buy the book I guess, but this stuff just kept coming and systematically grated on each of my nerves. To me she came off like a beret-clad sophomore art student from a "Doug" cartoon.
Next, viewers interested in considering her work in terms of content are left grasping at straws. The titles attached to her installations allude to a possible allegorical content (which on some occasions makes superficial connections with the materials used in the installations), begging for a psychoanalytic reading. Based on what I read in this book, there isn't too much of interest through that door, and she doesn't really tell us much to base such an analysis on. Another direction to take is to take the temporary nature of her work as a reaction against notions of art as a commodity. The book put that on the table, and it made sense. And though, yes, you can say that, the same can be said for the whole of installation art dating back decades before Stockholder got her hands in it. By not offering any real direction (certainly I didn't find any such thing in this book) on the issue of meaning or subject matter she's made a number of critics wary. Myself, after the admittedly powerful initial reaction to the brightness and color in her installations, I'm left empty and bored.
This is not to say that I find Stockholder's work completely without value. Her work does have a strong impact on a lot of people. And she has a great eye. Also, there is a fantastic article by Jack Bankowsky (from the Oct. 1990 issue of "Artforum") I highly recommend. He has a pretty interesting take on why her work is interesting. But based on this book alone, I was ready to write Stockholder off entirely. And even now I'd have to say Stockholder's work is not my cup of tea at all.
amazing

SHOWER BOOK FAILS
Great for beginners

poor use of peeking, poor overallThe whole point of these books is to "peek-a-boo" through the holes, and there's nothing to peek a boo in this book. As well, the colors are muted and the text is weak. I recommend you avoid this peek-a-board book if your child likes to peek-a-boo things thru the holes.
Our daughter's favorite book

Fine introduction to the field, but beware of the math

For young readers only.

New enlighting insights on grace, sacrament and faith.

Who let the dog out?
It could be worseThis is hardly great fiction, but I couldn't find any grammar or syntax problems. The characters are shallow and the plot(if you can call it that) is predictable. But I have read worse(books by Rep. Peter King and Saddam Hussein come to mind).
Despite the problems, this was only the author's first attempt at fiction and it does lay the ground work for his second, and much better book, The Evil We Do.
reasonably entertaining